predsedatel2
Sergey Gennadievich Kashmilo

Chairman of the Sharkovshchina District Executive Committee

We are glad to welcome you to the website of the Sharkovshchina District...

Working mode
  • пн
  • вт
  • ср
  • чт
  • пт
  • сб
  • вс
8:00-13:00 | 14:00-17:00

Acceptance of applications from citizens and legal entities from 8.00

Sharkovshchina Regional
Executive Committee

Sharkovshchina Regional
Executive Committee

Lukashenko outlines approach to improving scientific activity

9 February 2026

Lukashenko outlines approach to improving scientific activity

Funding for scientific activity and the remuneration of scientists should depend primarily on results, Belarusian President Aleksandr Lukashenko said at a meeting to discuss the draft decree on improving scientific activity in the country, BelTA has learned.

The head of state recalled that issues concerning the development of domestic science were recently discussed at a large-scale meeting (the meeting to discuss the development of the scientific sector and the activities of the National Academy of Sciences of Belarus on 21 November 2025): “At that time, a number of old, recurring issues were raised. Unfortunately, there was nothing new in the remarks of Vladimir Stepanovich [Karanik, Chairman of the Presidium of the National Academy of Sciences of Belarus] regarding the development and, perhaps, the reform or modernization of our Academy of Sciences. However, we agreed that we would prepare a draft decree on improving scientific activity in general, and that you would submit this draft decree for consideration.”

“I had quite a few questions after reviewing the draft decree, and I would like to discuss them with you. At the previous meeting, we agreed that when it comes to money, to payment, the mechanism is one, which is to pay for results. If there is a result, we pay. If there is no result, there will be no money. No matter how our undoubtedly intelligent scientists present this issue,” the head of state emphasized.

Aleksandr Lukashenko requested a report on how the draft decree ensures the achievement of goals and what instruments are proposed for this purpose. President noted. “So far, not much is clearly outlined: basic funding and opportunities for scientists to teach at universities. Well, who’s against that? No one is against it. In my opinion, today this process is successfully developing,” the president remarked. “But what about the efficiency and results of scientific activity? Here we have referential norms, as lawyers say: ‘This will be determined by the government’. So why are we even submitting a draft decree?”

Source